We review 15+ internet startups per working day. Vote for the one you think will be a killer.
13
Votes
+
In their own words
“GroupMe! extends the idea of social tagging systems like del.icio.us, Flickr or BibSonomy by introducing the group dimension. The foundation of social tagging systems are so-called folksonomies, which describe how users (folks) tag resources (e.g. photos, videos, publications, etc.). In technical terms a folksonomy is just a collection of tag assignments:
(User, Tag, Resource) = User has tagged Resource with Tag at a particular time.
Over time it is likely that semantics emerge, e.g. tags that are often assigned to same resources may be synonyms. Hence, folksonomies are promising to improve (web) search, etc. With GroupMe!'s approach of taggable groups we extend tag assignments with a group dimension:
(User, Tag, Group, Resource) = User has tagged Resource with Tag in a certain Group at a particular time.”
Why it might be a killer
GroupMe.org is easy to navigate all of the content is neatly organized. The about section of the site has a visual aid which outlines the differences between normal tagging and group tagging, this is useful. Being able to browse through the group section is a great way for visitors of the site to get a better idea of the site’s concept.
Some questions
GroupMe.org could use a more exciting interface. Other social tagging systems seem to be quite useful is GroupMe really necessary? Will GroupMe ever become as popular are other social bookmarking applications such as del.ic.ious?
Quick Share
More about groupme.org/GroupMe/
Related sites
groupme.org/GroupMe/ comments