We review 15+ internet startups per working day. Vote for the one you think will be a killer.
20
Votes
+
In their own words
“WikiBooks, a sister project to Wikipedia, began on July 10, 2003. It was opened in response to a request by Wikipedia user Karl Wick for a place to start building open content textbooks such as Organic Chemistry and Physics in order to bring education to humanity and reduce the costs and other limitations to top-quality learning materials. Some of the first books were completely original and others began as text copied over from other sources of GNU FDL textbooks found on the Internet. Controversies have included the scope of the project (just textbooks or all kinds of books) as well as how best to deal with licensing of the site content, as well as the name and future URL for the project. By July 31st 2003 there were 123 modules and 47 registered users. By October 10th (when Wikibooks was 3 months old) there were 530 modules and 150 registered users and by July 2005 WikiBooks passes 10,000 modules milestone.”
Why it might be a killer
WikiBooks produces a new kind of instructional resource that is comprehensive and free. Learners from around the globe who have access to the Web can find quality educational information, regardless of financial status, local/regional educational restrictions, or proximity to an educational institution.
Some questions
Is it a truly reliable resource? Will it be able to solve some of its most criticized aspects? Some of the things people criticize are that WikiBooks has many incomplete texts, and many argue that even the comprehensive texts (books rated at the highest level) are of poor quality. The HTML format of the compiled WikiBooks is not suitable for the traditional printing of books with fixed page-width and page-length. WikiBooks also inherits all the criticisms leveled towards wiki-style editing in general.
Quick Share
Related sites
wikibooks.org comments